Top, J.D. (2015) Can a meta-cognitive model for a mixed-motive bargaining task outperform humans when contesting human players? Bachelor's Thesis, Artificial Intelligence.
|
Text
AI_BA_2015_JordiTop.pdf - Published Version Download (467kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](https://fse.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Toestemming.pdf - Other Restricted to Backend only Download (46kB) |
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the question: Can a meta-cognitive model for a mixed-motive bargaining task outperform humans when contesting human players?". In our experiment two parties had to negotiate, with a computer model taking the role of one of the negotiators on half of our trials. Participants were asked to rate their counterpart's agreeability, without knowing whether this was a human or the model. No significant difference in agreeability and absolute score was found, yet the model gained a significantly higher relative score. These findings suggest that even if it only helps to improve relative economical gains, teaching people the meta-cognitive strategy can help them become better negotiators, and will not impair their performance on other relevant performance measures.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor's Thesis) |
|---|---|
| Degree programme: | Artificial Intelligence |
| Thesis type: | Bachelor's Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Feb 2018 08:05 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Feb 2018 08:05 |
| URI: | https://fse.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/id/eprint/12969 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |